Zero GST on individual health policies, inclusive coverage mandates and new portal-oversight mark a turning point for India’s health-insurance ecosystem
Dateline: New Delhi | 17 November 2025
Summary: The Indian government and insurance regulator have together initiated sweeping reforms in the health-insurance sector: from **zero GST** on individual health/term insurance premiums from 22 September, to new inclusive guidelines from the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) requiring no age-bar entry, reduced waiting periods for diseases and full AYUSH coverage. At the same time, the government is preparing to bring the national claims-exchange under tighter oversight to curb rising costs and hospital overcharging. The structural shift is significant—but challenges around execution, affordability, provider behaviour and claims-settlement remain urgent.
1. The key reform headlines
One of the biggest cost-relief moves in recent times: the government announced that, from 22 September 2025, individual life and health insurance premiums will attract 0% GST (Goods & Services Tax). Previously, these policies had an 18% GST component—raising the cost of purchase and renewal. This change alone promises to reduce upfront premium costs for many households.
Alongside, IRDAI published new health-insurance guidelines for 2025 that push for greater inclusion and consumer-focus. Some of the provisions: no maximum entry-age requirement (at least one policy from each insurer must cover any age); reduced waiting period for pre‐existing diseases from four to three years; full cover for AYUSH treatments (Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha, Homeopathy) with no sub-limits; dedicated plans for persons with disabilities, mental-health patients and specific segments.
In parallel, the government flagged reforms to oversight of the national health-claims portal, National Health Claims Exchange (NHCX). A source indicated it will be moved under joint supervision of the Finance Ministry and IRDAI to strengthen bargaining power of insurers, reduce inflated hospital-treatment costs and improve claims-settlement efficiency.
2. Why these reforms matter
India has long had low insurance-penetration compared with global peers, particularly in health cover. High premiums, age-bars, exclusions for chronic diseases, long waiting periods and poor service made many households either uninsured or under-insured. The reform changes key barriers:
- Lower upfront cost: removing GST on premiums helps make health insurance more affordable for middle and lower-income families.
- Broader access: age-neutral entry, inclusion of chronic/mental and disabilities segments mean more people can be covered.
- Better value: more transparent rules on waiting periods, full AYUSH cover expand the scope of claimability.
- Claims integrity: Oversight of the claims-exchange means reduction of cost-leakages and improved sustainability of insurer-models.
From a macro-economy perspective this is more than a consumer win: stronger health insurance can reduce out-of-pocket medical spending, free up household savings for consumption/investment and support India’s shift from disease-burden to prevention and financial resistance to medical shocks. For insurers and hospitals, the regulatory clarity offers a clearer future framework. For investors and fintech players in health-insurtech, it opens a larger addressable market.
3. The implications for households
For many households the immediate implication is cost-saving: an individual health policy with, say, ₹5 lakh cover that previously had an 18% GST component may now cost ~18% less (all else equal). Given that premium cost is often the biggest barrier to purchase, this could prompt first-time buyers and renewals.
Also, older adults and households with persons with pre-existing diseases who were previously excluded or loaded heavily will now find more options. If insurers comply with the new guidelines, senior-citizens could more easily obtain policies without large premium surcharges, and those with chronic conditions might access cover after three years rather than four. This represents better financial protection against hospital-costs and health shocks.
4. Business and insurer-model impact
For insurers this is a mixed signal. On the one hand, expanded demand and inclusion models may lift premium volumes; on the other hand, increased claim exposure, tighter regulations and downward price pressure (via GST removal) could compress margins. Early data show growth in standalone health-insurers remained modest in September: only ~3.1% year-on-year growth, while multi-line insurers grew ~1.9%—though the GST relief is very recent and business-cycle effects may follow with lag.
Insurers will need to adjust underwriting play-books, product-design costs, risk-pool composition and distribution channels. Start-ups and insurtech firms may find the regulatory tailwind helpful—greater penetration, simplified access and digital-onboarding can be scaled. Hospitals and providers will also face downward pressure on cost escalation, as insurer-bargaining and regulatory oversight intensify (via claims-portal supervision). The effect may begin as cost-pressure for providers, but ideally will lead to more standardised pricing, improved transparency and better service-levels.
5. Risks and caveats: where trouble zones lie
No reform of this scale is without wrinkles. Some of the key risk-areas include:
- Provider behaviour: Hospitals may seek alternative modes of cost escalation (longer stays, unnecessary diagnostics) if pricing pressure rises. Unless the oversight reform kicks in effectively, the cost-leakage may simply shift instead of reduce.
- Product-quality vs affordability trade-off: Insurers may keep premiums low but adjust cover terms (higher co-payments, exclusions, narrower hospital-networks) to preserve profitability—resulting in “cheap-but-less-effective” policies.
- Claims backlog and service-issues: As inclusion increases, claims-volume will rise. If TPA (third-party administrator) networks, claims systems and insurer capacities are not scaled, delays and denials may increase—undermining consumer trust. In fact, prior reportage already flagged issues of claim-denial, delay and hospital-billing inflation.
- Sustainability of cover for high-risk groups: Covering older age, chronic conditions and full AYUSH increases risk-costs. Unless underwriting is well-managed and risk-pooling effective, insurers may face financial pressure. This may lead to premium hikes or stricter policy-terms later—which could reverse the affordability gains.
6. What to watch next
In coming months the following indicators will be critical to assess whether the reforms deliver impact:
- Rate of first-time policy purchases and renewals post-the GST exemption—does affordability translate into increased uptake?
- Growth in premium volumes vs claim-ratios for health insurers—whether margins hold or deteriorate under new inclusive rules.
- Claims-processing times, rejection rates and hospital-billing behaviour, especially under the revamped oversight of the claims exchange portal.
- Product innovation and tiering—whether insurers introduce affordable plans with reasonable cover or rely on minimal skimp-options to capture cheap premiums.
- Behavior in high-risk segments—senior citizens, pre-existing conditions, disabilities, mental-health—whether they are truly covered or found excluded in practice.
7. Structural significance for India’s health-economy transition
The reforms fit into a broader shift in India’s health-economy: moving from patchy fragmented risk-coverage towards deeper insurance-penetration, from fee-for-service over-treatment toward negotiated pricing and preventive care, and from under-insured households toward better-protected ones. If successful, this could reduce catastrophic medical-expenditure risk, improve household financial resilience, reduce worry around health shocks and make public-health expenditure more effective.
8. Long-term questions: execution, inclusion, credibility
The ultimate measure of success will not be headlines—it will be how many households actually receive meaningful cover, how many avoid financial distress, how many insurers remain viable and how many hospitals deliver quality at controlled cost. India must move beyond “more policies sold” to “better protection delivered”. The policy-framework is now poised; the next challenge is delivery, monitoring and institutional capability.
9. Strategic advice for stakeholders
For policy-makers: Focus on monitoring system-wide performance, ensure oversight mechanisms are operational, publish transparency on claims and provider behaviour, and avoid unintended side-effects (such as insurers exiting high-risk segments).
For insurers and insurtech firms: Use the moment to expand reach, digitise onboarding and value-chain, invest in product differentiation, build risk-analytics and design badly-served-segments (senior, chronic, rural) as strategic bets.
For hospitals and providers: Prepare for greater negotiating power of insurers, harmonise costs, adopt standard pricing, focus on efficiency, and consider value-based care rather than high volume of unnecessary procedures.
For consumers/households: This may be a good time to review your health-cover, compare policies, look at waiting periods and network hospitals, and take advantage of lower premium cost—but also ensure you understand the cover, hospital network, exclusions and renewal terms.
10. Final reflection
These reforms represent a genuine inflection point in India’s health-insurance landscape. The zero GST on individual policies, inclusive entry norms and tighter claims oversight set the stage for a more robust risk-protection environment. But as always, the key lies in turning policy into practice. India has given itself the regulatory tools; turning them into outcomes—higher coverage, better claims experience, lower medical-financial-shock—is the next hill to climb.

+ There are no comments
Add yours